Hence tragedy presents a character in an idealised form. He is of respectful towards the oracles, in the sense that he has been afraid of what they have told him, and he does respect Teiresias before he is insulted by the apparently unjust and false charges against him.
It seems that Oedipus could have avoided his ill-destiny if he had taken certain precautions.
It is, however, important to understand that the idealisation does not mean that the characters are good in a strictly moral sense. The actions of people of the same type can, and do differ: Readers therefore feel that Oedipus misfortune is far greater than he deserves. Nor, again, that of a bad man passing from adversity to prosperity, for nothing can be more alien to the spirit of tragedy.
He addresses them as "my children" as behooved of the good kings of those times. Indeed this would lead to the play being rather undramatic as humility and modesty and meekness are perhaps the most undramatic human qualities. For instance, Ulysses must be characterised as he has been historically presented.
Readers once again feel sympathetic towards the character Oedipus towards the end of the play as Oedipus finally recognizes and accepts the oracles prophecy as it was predicted when he was born. Aristotle gives no example to illustrate his meaning in this context. Thus the tragic character is one who is not eminently good and just, yet whose misfortune is brought about not by vice and depravity, but by some error or frailty.
Rank and nobility of birth are now irrelevant. Finally the tragedy in Oedipus the King encouraged the readers to be passionate and most certainly quite emotional as readers too felt like they were experiencing everything that all the characters were.
Aristotle, with his insistence that practice is the source of character, would have maintained that one who has been brought up in slavery would not suddenly develop nobility and heroism.
The characters are better than we are. Modern tragedy has shown that tragedy is possible all its effectiveness even when the hero is ordinary and commonplace. The four points are: But he is essentially human, so that it is easy for us to identify ourselves with him and sympathise with him.
After all, he says that a completely depraved person is not fit to be a tragic hero. Oedipus is also a morally good personality, to a great extent.
It would not be correct to say that terror, here, outweighs pity. It is wickedness on a grand level; the wickedness is intellectual and resolute, and it raises the criminal above the commonplace and gives to him a sort of dignity.
Right action would become more and more spontaneous and immediate, and the sphere of deliberation more and more limited. It is the most effective of tragedies. The Thoroughly Depraved Character: Aristotle, the first philosopher to theorize the art of drama, obviously studied Oedipus and based his observation about the qualities of a tragic hero upon the example of Oedipus.
According to Aristotelian percepts about tragedy, a tragic hero would be a man of noticeable qualities of behavior, intelligent and powerful, but by no means perfect. He also points out certain characteristics that determine as tragic hero.
Thus it is slightly difficult to assess what exactly he means by the term. Whatever our twenty-first evaluation of the actions of Oedipus, the evaluation of his own creator Sophocles and of the tellers of the myth in ancient times is that it is morally wrong to fight against what fate has predetermined for us.
Oedipus evokes pity and terror from readers.Answer this question demonstrating specific understandings of the concepts of Tragedy and the Tragic Hero. In the Greek play, King Oedipus written by Sophocles, certain characteristics, which determine the traits of a tragic hero. Aug 15, · Modern tragedy has shown that tragedy is possible all its effectiveness even when the hero is ordinary and commonplace.
Rank and nobility of birth are now irrelevant. But the man who is the tragic hero should, nevertheless be a man of eminence, not of rank and position, as far as quality goes.
superiority. If the hero was imperfect or evil, then the audience would feel that he had gotten what he deserved. It is important to strike a balance in the hero's character. Eventually the Aristotelian tragic hero dies a tragic death, having fallen from great heights and having made an irreversible mistake.
Answer this question demonstrating specific understandings of the concepts of Tragedy and the Tragic Hero. In the Greek play, “King Oedipus” written by Sophocles, certain characteristics, which determine the traits of a tragic. Tragic Hero Definition: A tragic hero is a person, usually of noble birth, with heroic or potentially heroic qualities.
This person is doomed by fate, some supernatural force to be destroyed, or endure great suffering. The hero struggles admirably against this fate, but fails because of a flaw or mistake.
Answer this question demonstrating specific understandings of the concepts of Tragedy and the Tragic Hero. In the Greek play, “King Oedipus” written by Sophocles, certain characteristics, which determine the traits of a tragic hero, reveal themselves as the play unfolds.Download